Two of them showed abdominal cyst but we thought them as ovarian cyst and enteric duplication cyst. Another one did not reveal any abdominal (HKI-272).html cyst on prenatal USG. The sensitivity of prenatal USG on choledochal cyst was 83.3% (15/18). 2. There were 20 babies who were diagnosed to fetal choledochal cyst prenatally. Of these 20 neonates, fifteen had diagnosed to choledochal cyst by pathologic finding after surgery. And the others were revealed 3 normal findings, an esophageal duplication and omental cyst on postnatal examination. The PPV of prenatal USG was 75% (15/20). Ultrasonographic examination is a useful method in prenatal screening for fetal choledochal cyst. And our data may be helpful for parents counseling on fetal choledochal cyst. ""Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy is rare and risk factors are poorly defined. Our objective was to determine buy LY2835219 whether established risk factors for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) have similar prevalence in non-tubal ectopic pregnancies (NTEP). Retrospective review of all cases of NTEP across 3 gynaecology departments in one geographical area of London over a 5-year period to 2009. Demographics and gynaecological/obstetric history were collected. A data set of 422 tubal ectopic pregnancies over the same period from one of the hospitals was used for comparison. 61 cases of NTEP were identified: 30 interstitial, 18 Caesarean scar (CS), 11 cervical, 1 ovarian and 1 rudimentary horn (cornual). Median maternal age for EP was 31 years (16�C45) compared to 33 yr (22�C43) for interstitial (NS), 37 (30�C43) for Birinapant CS (P < 0.01) and 33 (26�C42) for cervical (NS). 44.4% of interstitial, 46.2% of CS and 42.9% of cervical pregnancies occurred in caucasians, compared with 53.8% of EP (NS). Median parity was 1, 2 and 0 respectively for interstitial, CS and cervical ectopics, compared with 0 in women with EP. Those developing interstitial and tubal EP had similar rates of previous ectopic (10% and 11% respectively), whereas more women with cervical ectopics had a history of previous EP (36%) (P < 0.01). Previous ectopic was not a risk factor for CS pregnancy (0% previous history). Previous miscarriage was more common in those developing NTEP than EP (27�C40% versus 20%) (P < 0.01). Similarly, women with NTEP were more likely to have had previous TOP (36�C39% versus 21%) (P < 0.01). The data suggest that risk factors for tubal ectopic pregnancies are significantly different from those for tubal ectopic pregnancy and care should be taken extrapolating such risk factors across all ectopic populations. ""Introduction: Cervical pregnancy has been raised due to increased artificial abortion and advanced assisted reproductive technology. Recently, conservative treatment is highly desirable for young women who want to preserve her fertility. We experienced a case of successful treatment of cervical pregnancy with combine treatment with KCl and methotrexate.
Captcha Challenge